Effects of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists on liver-related and cardiovascular mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes.

BACKGROUND: Patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) tend to have nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) with poorer prognosis. We performed this research to compare the risks of cardiovascular diseases, cirrhosis, liver-related mortality, and cardiovascular mortality between glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1 RA) use and no-use in patients with T2D without viral hepatitis. METHODS: From January 1, 2008, to December 31, 2018, we used propensity-score matching to identify 31,183 pairs of GLP-1 RA users and nonusers from Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database. Multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazards models were used to examine the outcomes between the study and control groups. RESULTS: The median (Q1, Q3) follow-up time for GLP-1 RA users and nonusers were 2.19 (1.35, 3.52) and 2.14 (1.19, 3.68) years, respectively. The all-cause mortality incidence rate was 5.67 and 13.06 per 1000 person-years for GLP-1 RA users and nonusers, respectively. Multivariable-adjusted analysis showed that GLP-1 RA use had significantly lower risks of all-cause mortality (aHR 0.48, 95%CI 0.43-0.53), cardiovascular events (aHR 0.92, 95%CI 0.86-0.99), cardiovascular death (aHR 0.57, 95%CI 0.45-0.72), and liver-related death (aHR 0.32, 95%CI 0.13-0.75). However, there was no significant difference in the risk of liver cirrhosis development, hepatic failure, and hepatocellular carcinoma compared to GLP-1 RA no-use. CONCLUSIONS: This nationwide cohort study showed that GLP-1 RA use was associated with a significantly lower risk of all-cause mortality, cardiovascular events, and cardiovascular death in patients with T2D among Taiwan population. More prospective studies are warranted to verify our results.

Respiratory Outcomes of Insulin Use in Patients with COPD: A Nationwide Population-Based Cohort Study.

Acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) with severe hyperglycemia may require insulin to lower glucose levels in people with coexisting type 2 diabetes (T2D) and COPD. We conducted this study to examine the risk of hospitalization for COPD, pneumonia, ventilator use, lung cancer, hypoglycemia, and mortality with and without insulin use in people with T2D and COPD. We adopted propensity-score-matching to identify 2370 paired insulin users and non-users from Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database between 1 January 2000 and 31 December 2018. Cox proportional hazards models and the Kaplan-Meier method were utilized to compare the risk of outcomes between study and control groups. The mean follow-up for insulin users and non-users was 6.65 and 6.37 years. Compared with no insulin use, insulin use was associated with a significantly increased risk of hospitalization for COPD (aHR 1.7), bacterial pneumonia (aHR 2.42), non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (aHR 5.05), invasive mechanical ventilation (aHR 2.72), and severe hypoglycemia (aHR 4.71), but with no significant difference in the risk of death. This nationwide cohort study showed that patients with T2D and COPD requiring insulin therapy may have an increased risk of acute COPD exacerbations, pneumonia, ventilator use, and severe hypoglycemia without a significant increase in the risk of death.

Sulfonylurea Use in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes and COPD: A Nationwide Population-Based Cohort Study.

We conducted this study to investigate the long-term outcomes of sulfonylurea (SU) use in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and type 2 diabetes (T2D). We used propensity-score matching to identify 6008 pairs of SU users and nonusers from Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database from 1 January 2000 to 31 December 2017. Cox proportional hazard models were used to compare the risks of mortality, cardiovascular events, non-invasive positive pressure ventilation, invasive mechanical ventilation, bacterial pneumonia, lung cancer, and hypoglycemia between SU users and nonusers. In the matched cohorts, the mean follow-up time for SU users and nonusers was 6.57 and 5.48 years, respectively. Compared with nonusers, SU users showed significantly lower risks of mortality [aHR 0.53(0.48-0.58)], cardiovascular events [aHR 0.88(0.81-0.96)], non-invasive positive pressure ventilation [aHR 0.74(0.6-0.92)], invasive mechanical ventilation [aHR 0.57(0.5-0.66)], and bacterial pneumonia [aHR 0.78(0.7-0.87)]. A longer cumulative duration of SU use was associated with a lower risk of these outcomes. This nationwide cohort study demonstrated that SU use was associated with significantly lower risks of cardiovascular events, ventilation use, bacterial pneumonia, and mortality in patients with COPD and T2D. SU may be a suitable option for diabetes management in these patients.

Clinical course of adolescents with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A nationwide cohort study in Taiwan.

AIMS/INTRODUCTION: The global incidence of adolescents with type 2 diabetes mellitus is increasing. This cohort study was conducted aiming to describe the characteristics, drug-use condition, and long-term outcomes of adolescents with type 2 diabetes mellitus. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two thousand seven hundred fifty-five newly diagnosed adolescents with type 2 diabetes mellitus (using ICD-9-CM: 250.x and having ≥3 clinic visits) were identified from the national health insurance dataset during 2000-2014. Treatments were classified into four groups: metformin, sulfonylurea (SU), metformin plus SU, and insulin with or without oral antidiabetic drugs. The multiple Cox regression model was used to compare the risks of mortality and hospitalization among these four groups. RESULTS: The mean follow-up period was 5.4 years. After 1 year of antidiabetic treatment, they gradually needed intensified therapy, and at 3 years, half of them showed treatment failure. The mortality rate was 2.08 per 1,000 person-years. Respiratory diseases (36.2%) and dysglycemia (16.4%) were the most common causes of hospitalization among these adolescents. Compared with persons taking metformin plus SU, metformin users were associated with a lower risk of all-cause hospitalization [0.82 (0.67-0.99)]; insulin users were associated with a higher risk of dysglycemia [4.38 (2.14-8.96)], cancer [3.76 (1.39-10.1)], and respiratory hospitalization [1.66 (1.14-2.41)]; and SU users were associated with a higher risk of hospitalization for respiratory diseases [1.91 (1.13-3.23)]. CONCLUSIONS: This nationwide cohort study demonstrated that adolescents with type 2 diabetes mellitus were prone to treatment failure. Furthermore, respiratory diseases and dysglycemia were the most common causes of hospitalization.

Metformin use and cirrhotic decompensation in patients with type 2 diabetes and liver cirrhosis.

AIMS: To compare the risks of all-cause mortality, hepatic outcomes, major adverse cardiovascular events between metformin users and nonusers for patients with diabetes and cirrhosis. METHODS: From the Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database, we selected propensity-score matched metformin users and nonusers from the cohorts of type 2 diabetes mellitus with compensated (n = 26 164) or decompensated liver cirrhosis (n = 15 056) between 1 January 2000 and 31 December 2009, and followed them until 31 December 2010. Cox proportional hazards models with robust sandwich standard error estimates were used to assess risk of investigated outcomes for metformin users. RESULTS: The incidence rates of mortality during follow-up were 3.8 and 3.3 per 100 patient-years (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.13, 95% confidence interval 1.01-1.25) for metformin users and nonusers, respectively. The incidence rates of cirrhotic decompensation during follow-up were 5.9 and 4.9 per 100 patient-years (aHR 1.15, 95% confidence interval 1.04-1.27) for metformin users and nonusers. The risk of death (P for trend <.01) and cirrhotic decompensation (P for trend <.0001) associated with metformin use was significant for those taking metformin for >40 defined daily doses in 90 days or >1000 mg/d. The outcomes of metformin use vs nonuse for type 2 diabetes mellitus with decompensated liver cirrhosis were not statistically different, except that metformin users had higher risk of mortality (aHR 1.15). CONCLUSION: Metformin use was associated with higher risks of mortality and cirrhotic decompensation in patients with compensated liver cirrhosis. Prospective studies are required to confirm our results.

Liver-related long-term outcomes of alpha-glucosidase inhibitors in patients with diabetes and liver cirrhosis.

Background: Adequate management of diabetes in patients with liver cirrhosis can be challenging. We conducted this study to investigate the liver-related long term outcomes of alpha-glucosidase inhibitors (AGIs) in patients with diabetes and cirrhosis. Methods: From National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD) in Taiwan, we recruited propensity-score matched alpha-glucosidase inhibitor users and non-users from a cohort of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) with compensated liver cirrhosis between 1 January 2000, and 31 December 2017, and followed them until 31 December 2018. Cox proportional hazards models with robust sandwich standard error estimates were used to assess the risk of main outcomes for alpha-glucosidase inhibitor users versus non-users. Results: The incidence rates of mortality during follow-up were 65.56 vs. 96.06 per 1,000 patient-years for alpha-glucosidase inhibitor users and non-users, respectively. The multivariable-adjusted model shows that alpha-glucosidase inhibitor users had significantly lower risks of all-cause mortality (aHR 0.63, 95% CI 0.56-0.71), hepatocellular carcinoma (aHR 0.55, 95% CI 0.46-0.67), decompensated cirrhosis (aHR 0.74 95% CI 0.63-0.87), hepatic encephalopathy (aHR 0.72, 95% CI 0.60-0.87), and hepatic failure (aHR 0.74, 95% CI 0.62-0.88) than alpha-glucosidase inhibitor non-users. Patients who received alpha-glucosidase inhibitors for a cumulative duration of more than 364 days had significantly lower risks of these outcomes than non-users. Conclusion: Alpha-glucosidase inhibitor use was associated with a lower risk of mortality, hepatocellular carcinoma, decompensated cirrhosis, and hepatic failure in patients with diabetes and compensated cirrhosis. alpha-glucosidase inhibitors may be useful for the management of diabetes in patients with compensated liver cirrhosis. Large-scale prospective studies are required to verify our results.

Thiazolidinedione Use in Individuals With Type 2 Diabetes and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.

Few studies have investigated the effects of various antidiabetic agents on individuals with both type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). This study compared mortality, cardiovascular events and respiratory outcomes in individuals with both T2DM and COPD taking TZD vs. those not taking TZD. From Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database, 12 856 propensity-score-matched TZD users and non-users were selected between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2012. Cox proportional hazards models were used to calculate the risks of investigated outcomes. Compared with non-use of TZD, the adjusted hazard ratios (95% CI) of TZD use were stroke 1.63 (1.21-2.18), coronary artery disease 1.55 (1.15-2.10), heart failure 1.61 (1.06-2.46), non-invasive positive pressure ventilation 1.82 (1.46-2.27), invasive mechanical ventilation 1.23 (1.09-1.37), bacterial pneumonia 1.55 (1.42-1.70), and lung cancer 1.71 (1.32-2.22), respectively. The stratified analysis disclosed that rosiglitazone, not pioglitazone, was associated with significantly higher risk of major cardiovascular events than TZD non-users. In patients with concomitant T2DM and COPD, TZD use was associated with higher risks of cardiovascular events, ventilation use, pneumonia, and lung cancer. Use of TZD in these patients should be supported by monitoring for cardiovascular and respiratory complications.

Is insulin the preferred treatment in persons with type 2 diabetes and liver cirrhosis?

BACKGROUND: Insulin is highly recommended for diabetes management in persons with liver cirrhosis. However, few studies have evaluated its long-term effects in these persons. We conducted this study to compare the risks of mortality, liver-related complications, and cardiovascular events in persons with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and compensated liver cirrhosis. METHODS: From January 1, 2000, to December 31, 2012, we selected 2047 insulin users and 4094 propensity score-matched nonusers from Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database. Cox proportional hazard models were used to assess the risks of outcomes. RESULTS: The mean follow-up time was 5.84 years. The death rate during the follow-up period was 5.28 and 4.07 per 100 person-years for insulin users and nonusers, respectively. In insulin users, the hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of all-cause mortality, hepatocellular carcinoma, decompensated cirrhosis, hepatic failure, major cardiovascular events, and hypoglycemia were 1.31 (1.18-1.45), 1.18 (1.05-1.34), 1.53 (1.35-1.72), 1.26 (1.42-1.86), 1.41 (1.23-1.62), and 3.33 (2.45-4.53), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective cohort study indicated that among persons with T2DM and compensated liver cirrhosis, insulin users were associated with higher risks of death, liver-related complications, cardiovascular events, and hypoglycemia compared with insulin nonusers.

Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors may accelerate cirrhosis decompensation in patients with diabetes and liver cirrhosis: a nationwide population-based cohort study in Taiwan.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Management of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in patients with liver cirrhosis is complex and suboptimal, but no clinical trial has adequately investigated antidiabetic drug use for such patients. We evaluate the risk of mortality, cardiovascular events, and hepatic outcomes between dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitor users and nonusers in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and cirrhosis. METHODS: We selected 2828 paired propensity score matched DPP-4 inhibitor users and nonusers from a cohort of T2DM with compensated liver cirrhosis between January 1, 2007, and December 31, 2012. Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess the risk of main outcomes for DPP-4 inhibitor users. RESULTS: The incidence rate of decompensated cirrhosis during follow-up was 2.20 and 1.53 per 100 patient-years (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.35, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.03-1.77) for DPP-4 inhibitor users and nonusers, respectively. The aHRs (95% CI) of variceal bleeding and hepatic failure were 1.67 (1.11-2.52) and 1.35 (1.02-1.79), respectively, for DPP-4 inhibitor users over nonusers. The risk of all-cause mortality, hepatocellular carcinoma, and major cardiovascular events between DPP-4 inhibitor users and nonusers were not statistically different. CONCLUSIONS: This study found that DPP-4 inhibitor users were associated with higher risks of decompensated cirrhosis and hepatic failure than did nonusers among patients with T2DM and compensated liver cirrhosis. We must continue to search for appropriate antidiabetic drugs for patients with liver cirrhosis.

Persons with type 2 diabetes and high insulin persistence were associated with a lower risk of mortality: A nationwide retrospective cohort study.

AIMS/INTRODUCTION: Studies assessing the long-term outcomes of insulin persistence are scant. We compared the risk of all-cause mortality among patients with different degrees of insulin persistence. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In total, 293,210 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus undergoing insulin therapy were enrolled during 2002-2014. Insulin persistence was defined as continual insulin treatment without a 90-day gap of discontinuation in the 2-year observation period. Mortality rates were compared between 111,220 patients with ≥90% insulin persistence and 111,220 matched patients with <90% insulin persistence during the observational period. RESULTS: During the mean 5.37-year follow-up period, the mortality rates were 58.26 and 73.21 per 1,000 person-years for patients with ≥90% and <90% of insulin persistence. The adjusted hazard ratio for mortality was 0.80 (95% confidence interval 0.79-0.81, P < 0.001). Patients with high insulin persistence had significantly lower risks than did those with low insulin persistence of death due to hypertension, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, liver disease, kidney disease, respiratory disease, sepsis and cancer. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that patients with ≥90% insulin persistence were associated with lower risks of all-cause mortality than did patients with <90% insulin persistence.

Thiazolidinediones were associated with higher risk of cardiovascular events in patients with type 2 diabetes and cirrhosis.

BACKGROUND& AIMS: Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) management in patients with cirrhosis is complicated. No clinical trials have investigated appropriate antidiabetic drug use in these patients. This study compared the risks of all-cause mortality, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and hepatic outcomes between patients with T2DM and cirrhosis using and not using thiazolidinedione (TZD). METHODS: We selected 1,705 propensity score-matched TZD users and nonusers from a Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database cohort of T2DM patients with compensated cirrhosis between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2012 and followed them until December 31, 2013. Cox proportional hazards models with robust sandwich standard error estimates were used to assess risks of investigated outcomes for TZD users. RESULTS: MACE incidence rates during follow-up were 2.14 and 1.30 per 100 patient-years for TZD users and nonusers, respectively (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.70; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.32-2.19). On the basis of TZD use, the aHRs (95% CIs) for stroke, ischemic heart disease and heart failure were 1.81 (1.28-2.55), 1.59 (1.03-2.44) and 2.09 (1.22-3.60) respectively. Compared with TZD nonusers, rosiglitazone users had significantly higher aHR [1.67 (1.26-2.20)] and pioglitazone users had no significant difference of aHR [1.12 (0.90-1.64)]. All-cause mortality, hepatocellular carcinoma, decompensated cirrhosis and hepatic failure risks did not differ significantly between TZD users and nonusers. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with nonuser, TZD users demonstrated significantly higher MACE risks. Therefore, the risks of cardiovascular complications should be considered when prescribing TZDs to patients with T2DM and cirrhosis.

Respiratory outcomes of metformin use in patients with type 2 diabetes and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Few studies investigated the respiratory outcomes of metformin use in patients with coexistent type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). We want to compare the long-term respiratory endpoints of metformin use and nonuse in patients with T2DM and COPD. This retrospective cohort study enrolled patients with T2DM and COPD from Taiwan's National Health Insurance Program between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2012. Main outcomes were hospitalized bacterial pneumonia, hospitalization for COPD, noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV), invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV), and lung cancer. In total, 20,644 propensity score-matched metformin users and nonusers were assessed. The adjusted hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) of metformin use relative to nonuse for bacterial pneumonia, hospitalization for COPD, NIPPV, IMV, and lung cancer were 1.17 (1.11-1.23), 1.34 (1.26-1.43), 0.99 (0.89-1.10), 1.10 (1.03-1.17), and 1.12 (0.96-1.30). Metformin use also exhibited significant dose-response relationship with respect to the risks of bacterial pneumonia, hospitalization for COPD and IMV. Consistent results were found in the sensitivity test. This nationwide cohort study demonstrated that in patients with T2DM and COPD, metformin use was associated with higher risks of pneumonia, hospitalization for COPD, and IMV. If patients with COPD use metformin, vigilance with regard to their pulmonary condition may be required.

Urate-lowering therapy may mitigate the risks of hospitalized stroke and mortality in patients with gout.

OBJECTIVES: Although studies have demonstrated the association of hyperuricemia with cardiovascular (CV) diseases, few have explored the effect of urate-lowering therapy (ULT) on the incidence of CV diseases. Therefore, we compared the risks of hospitalized coronary artery disease (CAD), stroke, heart failure (HF), and all-cause mortality between ULT users and nonusers among patients with gout. METHODS: We performed this retrospective cohort study using Taiwan's population-based National Health Insurance Research Database. In total, 5218 patients with gout were included from 2000 to 2012. We compared the incidence rates (IRs) of hospitalized CAD, stroke, HF, and all-cause mortality between ULT users and matched nonusers. RESULTS: The IRs of hospitalized stroke were 0.6 and 1.0 per 100 person-years for ULT users and nonusers, respectively, after adjusting for age, sex, residence, comorbidities, and medications. ULT users showed lower adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) for hospitalized stroke (aHR: 0.52, p < 0.001) and all-cause mortality (aHR: 0.6, p = 0.02) than nonusers. Subgroup analyses revealed that uricosuric agents and xanthine oxidase inhibitors were significantly associated with lower risks of hospitalized stroke and all-cause mortality, respectively. The effect of uricosuric agents on the decrease in hospitalized stroke risk indicated a dose-response relationship. CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed lower risks of hospitalized stroke and all-cause mortality in ULT users than in nonusers among patients with gout. Therefore, patients with gout may receive ULT to mitigate the risks of hospitalized stroke and mortality.

All-cause mortality of insulin plus dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors in persons with type 2 diabetes.

BACKGROUND: Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors could effectively reduce HbA1C and postprandial hyperglycemia and could incur only minimal danger of hypoglycemia. Patients with uncontrolled diabetes might be treated by the complementary action of insulin plus DPP-4 inhibitors. Here, we compared the all-cause mortality risk between DPP-4 inhibitor users and nonusers with underlying insulin therapy. METHODS: Using the population-based National Health Insurance Research Database of Taiwan, we conducted an 11-year retrospective cohort study. A total of 3120 patients undergoing insulin therapy for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) during 2000-2010 were enrolled. The overall incidence rates for all-cause mortality of 1560 DPP-4 inhibitor users and 1560 matched DPP-4 inhibitor nonusers were compared. RESULTS: No significant difference was found in the baseline demographic and clinical variables of the two groups of patients. Median follow-up period for the matched cohort was 1.67 years. All-cause mortality was observed in 93 (6.0%) of 1560 DPP-4 inhibitor nonusers and 36 (2.3%) of 1560 DPP-4 users. The incidence rate of mortality was 11.72 for DPP-4 inhibitor users and 38.16 per 1000 person-years for DPP-4 inhibitor nonusers. After multivariate adjustment, DPP-4 inhibitor users ran a reduced mortality risk (adjusted hazard ratio 0.32, 95% CI 0.22-0.47; p < 0.0001) than did the nonusers. CONCLUSION: Risk of all-cause mortality may be reduced when using insulin plus DPP-4 inhibitors than when using insulin plus non-DPP-4 inhibitors.